Can you explain what is exposed?
We identify material weaknesses across technology, access, monitoring, governance, and operational dependencies.
Cybersecurity assessments for Libyan organizations
See the risk.
See the risk.
Set the priority.
Move with confidence.
Independent, evidence-based assessments that give leadership a clear view of the current security posture, the risks that matter most, and the practical actions required next.
Libya-basedEngineering-ledVendor-neutralExecutive and technical reporting
Assessment signal mapEvidence in review
Current postureEvidence based
GovernanceControl ownership
IdentityPrivileged access
NetworkArchitecture review
ExposurePrioritized risk
MonitoringDetection coverage
ResilienceRecovery readiness
Outcome 01Clear findings
Outcome 02Risk priorities
Outcome 03Action roadmap
Evidence before assumptionsControls are verified, not merely listed
Priorities before noiseRisks are ranked in operational context
Ownership before confusionActions are tied to responsible stakeholders
Roadmap before spendingInvestment follows a defensible plan
The management question
Can you prove your controls are working?
Firewalls, antivirus, backups, and policies are important. They do not automatically prove that the environment is secure, monitored, recoverable, or properly governed. An Alkabas assessment replaces uncertainty with evidence and priorities.
Can you separate urgent risk from background noise?
Findings are prioritized by likelihood, business impact, control effectiveness, and the reality of your environment.
Can management act on the result?
Leadership receives clear ownership, quick wins, remediation priorities, and a phased improvement roadmap.
Assessment scope
A connected view of cybersecurity risk.
Every engagement is scoped around the organization’s systems, sector, risk profile, locations, and operational priorities. Depending on the authorized scope, the assessment may cover the following areas.
Governance and readiness
Policies, responsibilities, risk ownership, evidence quality, third-party controls, and readiness against relevant requirements.
Network and infrastructure
Architecture, segmentation, firewall policy, remote access, wireless security, management exposure, and hardening.
Identity and privileged access
User lifecycle, administrative paths, multi-factor authentication, dormant accounts, role design, and least privilege.
Vulnerability and exposure
External and internal exposure, authorized scanning, patching gaps, unsupported systems, prioritization, and validation.
Monitoring and incident readiness
Log coverage, alerting, escalation, evidence preservation, detection maturity, and incident-response procedures.
Backup and resilience
Backup coverage, restoration readiness, recovery ownership, continuity dependencies, and essential-service resilience.
Engagement method
Structured enough to be defensible. Practical enough to use.
Active testing is never performed without written authorization. Missing evidence and scope limitations are documented rather than hidden.
Scope and authorize
Define systems, objectives, stakeholders, boundaries, testing rules, and required evidence.
Review and validate
Examine documentation, configurations, architecture, exposure, logs, and operating practices.
Prioritize the risk
Rank findings by likelihood, business impact, existing controls, and operational context.
Brief and roadmap
Deliver management clarity, technical evidence, ownership, quick wins, and phased actions.
Decision-ready outputs
Not a scanner export. A usable security plan.
Deliverables are agreed during scoping and designed for both leadership and the technical teams responsible for implementation.
Executive posture summaryA concise view of the current position, material risk, and management decisions.
LeadershipEvidence-based technical findingsConfirmed observations, affected areas, risk context, and recommended remediation.
TechnicalPrioritized risk registerOwnership, severity, business impact, treatment priority, and status tracking.
Governance30/60/90-day action planQuick wins and phased improvements that account for dependencies and continuity.
RoadmapFrequently asked questions
Clear answers before the engagement begins.
Scope, authorization, timelines, testing depth, and required inputs are confirmed during the initial discussion.
Is a cybersecurity assessment the same as a penetration test?
No. A penetration test is a focused form of authorized technical testing. A cybersecurity assessment can be broader, covering governance, architecture, identity, vulnerabilities, monitoring, incident readiness, backup, and resilience. Penetration testing may be included or commissioned separately when appropriate.
Will the assessment disrupt our operations?
The engagement begins with non-intrusive review and evidence collection. Any active testing is agreed in advance, authorized in writing, and planned around operational risk and business continuity.
Does the assessment certify us as compliant with NISSA?
No. Alkabas Global does not certify organizations on behalf of NISSA. Where relevant, the assessment can support readiness by mapping evidence and findings to applicable controls and identifying gaps requiring attention.
Move from uncertainty to a clear security plan.
Start with a confidential scoping discussion. We will define the right assessment boundaries, objectives, evidence requirements, and next steps for your organization.